* Medtox
"language" for these categories is:
"invalid." Their certifying scientist defines it (correctly)
as a new category of invalid.
DILUTE SCUDO
is language I invented. It actually means dilute and requiring a
Second
Collection
Under
Direct
Observation.
The lab will actually report
this to the MRO using nomenclature they are still debating about; and
reporting the actual creatinine level and specific gravity reading. The
new "regs" indicate they will use the term
"negative dilute" ...but Medtox has decided to use the term
"invalid" for this new category of
validity results.
This "result" will be very rare and we will always include the DER/Employer's
instructions in the assertion part of our reports.
NEW
¶ 40.67 (a) (3) [A directly observed collection
is conducted if] The laboratory reported to the MRO that the specimen was
negative-dilute with a creatinine concentration greater than or equal to 2
mg/dL but less than or equal to 5 mg/dL, and the MRO reported the specimen
to you as negative-dilute and that a second collection must take place
under direct observation.
NOTE
that for years we have reported our tests which are both dilute and
negative (for drugs) as "DILUTE NEGATIVE"
as opposed to "NEGATIVE DILUTE." The primary reason for this has been the
ability to quickly identify them visually in the tabular displays. As
luck would have it, the new terminology of "negative dilute" provided in
the new rules will NOT be a conflict; although I do not think it's a good
choice of language by the DOT. For this reason, I plan to use the words
"Dilute SCUDO" until someone in a
high place tells me it is just too silly. Although very rare, all these
specimens are actually "super-dilute"
or "unbelievably dilute" or
"invalidly dilute" ...any of which
would have been better terms than
"negative dilute" which is a term we already use all the time.
These specimens were all called "substituted" in times past; but,
unfortunately, newer research shows that we just CAN'T PROVE IT with 100%
certainty with creatinines between 2 & 5.
WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? These rules changes have
occurred to accommodate the RHUBARB that was caused regarding the
definition of a substituted specimen. All
the specimens in the new "category" used to be called "substuted"
and most of them probably do indicate an attempt to cheat on a drug test.
Because it has been shown to be a rare possibility for a human to produce
urine with creatinine between 2 and 5 and specific gravity as shown above,
the new rules give a "second chance" to donors whose specimens meet those
criteria.
Daniel C. Drew, M.D. ~~~
Nationwide Medical Review